On October 10, 2018 Oregon Wild released a new report, "Forest Defense Is Climate Defense", about the fascinating relationship between our forests and the climate. The report compiles the latest research on forest-carbon and explains how the single most effective action Oregon can take to combat climate change is to change our forest policies.
The report contains the following sections:
- Forest-Carbon 101
- Solution #1: Modernize Oregon’s Logging Laws
- Solution #2: Protect Our Public Lands
- Adapting to Climate Change
- Take Action!
Download the report here: FOREST DEFENSE IS CLIMATE DEFENSE (pdf)
Click Here to see highlights from the Oregon Global Warming Commission and their Forest Carbon Report.
SERIES OF EDUCATIONAL FORUMS
Oregon Wild and partner groups hosted a series of educational forums around the state in 2018 about the relationship between the climate and our forests. These presentations in Corvallis, Eugene, Oregon City, Newport, and Portland educated hundreds of Oregonians. Below is a video recording of the December 4th Portland forum.
1. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests - Law, Beverly E. (Oregon State University), et al. (2018)
- Logging is Oregon’s largest source of carbon emissions.
- Between 2011–2015, forest fires only accounted for 4% of Oregon's total carbon emissions each year, whereas logging accounted for roughly 35%.
- The Pacific Northwest represents some of the highest carbon density forests in the world, which can store carbon in trees for 800 years or more.
- Extending the harvest intervals on private lands would have major climate benefits.
- Cut logging on public lands in half would have huge climate benefits.
2. Severe fire weather and intensive forest management increase fire severity in a multi‐ownership landscape - Zald, Harold S. J., et al. (2018)
- Old-growth forests are much more resilient to forest fires compared to young, dense tree plantations.
3. Summer streamflow deficits from regenerating Douglas-fir forest in the Pacific Northwest, USA - Perry, Timothy D., and Julia A. Jones (2016)
- Old-growth forests are much better at storing and releasing water than timber plantations.
- Average daily streamflow in summer (July through September) in basins with 34 to 43 year‐old plantations of Douglas‐fir was 50% lower than streamflow from reference basins with 150‐ to 500‐year‐old forests dominated by Douglas‐fir, western hemlock, and other conifers
- Reduced summer streamflow in headwater basins with forest plantations may limit aquatic habitat and exacerbate stream warming
- Legacies of past forest management or extensive natural disturbances may be confounded with effects of climate change on streamflow in large river basins.
4. High-Biomass Forests of the Pacific Northwest: Who Manages Them and How Much is Protected? - Krankina, Olga N., et al. (2014)
- The level of protection for high-biomass forests varies by state, for example, 31% of all high-biomass federal forests in Washington are in high-protection status compared to only 9% in Oregon.
- The forests of the Pacific Northwest are among the most carbon dense ecosystems in the world.
5. Roadless areas and clean water - DellaSala, Dominick, et al. (2011)
- Healthy watersheds with low road density and mature trees store and filter water.
6. Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests - Frey, Sarah, et al. (2016)
- Mature and intact forests also provide shade that keeps streams cool and oxygenated for salmon and trout.
7. Climate Change in the Pacific Northwest - US Fish & Wildlife Service (2011)
- As the climate warms, Oregon will continue to see more precipitation falling as rain instead of snow, more floods and landslides, and more frequent and prolonged droughts.
8. Forestry, Landslides, and Public Safety - Oregon Board of Forestry (2001)
- Healthy forests with low road density and mature trees reduce the risk of landslides.
- Oregon lags far behind its neighbors in protecting public lands.
- 4% of Oregon has been designated as protected Wilderness, compared to 10% in Washington and 15% in California.
10. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size - Stephenson, Nathan, et al. (2014)
- Old forests store far more carbon than young forests.
- Large, old trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon compared to smaller trees; at the extreme, a single big tree can add the same amount of carbon to the forest within a year as is contained in an entire mid-sized tree.
11. Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape - McGuire, Jenny, et al. (2016)
- Large, intact wild areas facilitate the migration of species to higher latitudes and elevations where they can find cooler areas or more suitable habitat.
- Facilitating movement will be crucial for preventing biodiversity losses in the climate change era.
12. Protected areas: providing natural solutions to 21st Century challenges - Lopoukhine, N., et al. (2012)
- Protected areas, when integrated into land use plans as part of larger and connected conservation networks, offer practical, tangible solutions to the problems of both species loss and adaptation to climate change.
13. Oregon has the weakest logging rules in the region. The neighboring states of Washington, California, and Idaho all do more to protect streams and communities from the impacts of logging practices like clearcutting and the aerial spraying of herbicides.
- Oregon lawmakers propose tightening West Coast's weakest weed killer aerial spray laws - The Oregonian (2/10/15)
- Do Oregon's clear-cut and pesticide buffers protect drinking water from creeks, rivers? - The Oregonian (8/20/13)
- Oregon Environmental Groups, Lawmakers Target Logging Rules - Oregon Public Broadcasting (2/22/17)
- Comparisons between Oregon Forest Practices and Other State Forest Practices - Oregon Stream Protection Coalition (2014)
14. Graph: Oregon’s Annual Carbon Emissions (2011-2015)
- Data from Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests - Law, et al (2018), and the Oregon Global Warming Commission
15. Graph: Fate of Carbon from Harvested Wood
- Data from Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States - Smith, et al. (2006)
- Data also from Patterns and mechanisms of the forest carbon cycle - Gower, et al. (2006)
- Design by Jarrett Matthews
Photo by Eric DeBord