Contact:    
Lauren Anderson, Oregon Wild

Portland, OR – Yesterday, the Trump administration announced plans to move the Forest Service headquarters from Washington D.C. to Salt Lake City, Utah, shut down all regional offices, and consolidate all research facilities to Fort Collins, Colorado.

The Pacific Northwest Region office in Portland, Oregon, will be shut down.

“Moving the Forest Service headquarters to Utah sends a very clear message. Utah’s leadership is dedicated to dismantling America’s public lands,” said Climate Forests Program Manager Lauren Anderson. “The Trump administration is moving the hen house into the fox den.”

Utah’s legislature has spent millions of dollars both litigating and in a public relations campaign to take control of national public lands. Senator Mike Lee from Utah famously attempted to include language mandating the sale of Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management lands in the Senate reconciliation bill, a move that provoked outrage from across the political spectrum and was ultimately withdrawn. 

“The agency’s attempt to move to a ‘state-based model, ‘ led by leadership in Utah, is no coincidence. It is another step towards privatizing management of America’s public lands and transferring control to states and corporate interests,” continued Anderson. “They are gutting environmental protections, suppressing science, and cutting the public out of public lands decisions.”

Yesterday’s announcement came as a shock to local Forest Service employees, some of whom received letters yesterday afternoon notifying them that their positions were subject to the reorganization and/or relocation. The US Forest Service workforce has already lost thousands of employees, approximately 16% of its workforce. The Trump administration’s attempts to relocate the Bureau of Land Management offices in his first term led to an exodus of staff experience and expertise, with 87% of the staff choosing to leave the agency. 

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins’ press release includes: “Additional phases of the reorganization, including the formal elimination of regional and station office structures and the full transition to a state-based model, will be implemented over the coming year.” 10 Regional offices will be replaced with 15 state-based offices led by political appointees. Oregon’s state office will eventually be based in Salem, with the nearest Forest Service operations centers (distinct from ranger stations) being hundreds of miles away in Missoula, MT, and Placerville, CA.

Background:

  • National forests in Oregon cover roughly 16 million acres, representing about 25% of the state’s total land area. The US Forest Service manages 11 national forests in Oregon.
  • Offices for the U.S. Forest Service Northwest Region Headquarters and the Pacific Northwest Research Station are currently based in Portland, OR. 
  • A new report from the USDA’s Office of Inspector General shows the USDA lost over 20,000 employees between January and June 2025, nearly one-fifth of its total workforce. The U.S. Forest Service was the hardest hit of all the USDA departments, losing 5,860 employees, or approximately 16 percent of its total workforce.
  • This new announcement from Secretary Rollins will result in another wave of layoffs and resignations, further dismantling an already severely damaged agency that is responsible for managing 193 million acres nationwide. 
  • It is unclear how many people the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station employed before the layoffs, but estimates show between 250 -roughly 500 people, including scientists, technicians, and administrative staff across 11 locations in Alaska, Oregon, and Washington. Beyond the headquarters in Portland, the agency has identified 5 experimental forest stations and three research labs.  Learn more about the PNW Research Station here.

###

Oregon Wild represents 20,000 members and supporters who share our mission to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy. Our goal is to protect areas that remain intact while striving to restore areas that have been degraded.

Photo by David Herasimtschuk

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild
Sristi Kamal, Western Environmental Law Center

Salem, Ore., – Today, the Oregon Senate passed HB 4134, the “1.25% for Wildlife” bill. The bill had previously passed the Oregon House of Representatives with bipartisan support and now heads to Governor Tina Kotek’s desk to be signed into law.

HB 4134 was supported by a broad coalition of conservation, hunting, fishing, forestry, farming, ranching, and business stakeholders. Public testimony has been overwhelmingly in favor of the bill, with over 84% in support.

“We applaud Oregon lawmakers for their efforts and recognize that this was not an easy vote for many. But it was the right vote,” said Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager for Oregon Wild. “With 1.25% for Wildlife, we are investing in our fish and wildlife, in the landscapes and communities that sustain us, in our drinking water, health, and safety. While HB 4134 is focused on wildlife and their habitats, it is really a commitment to future generations: that the Oregon we know and love today is the one we are determined to pass along to those who come next.”

Through a modest increase in the statewide lodging tax, HB 4134 will fund wildlife and habitat conservation, primarily the implementation of the state’s Wildlife Action Plan, which has identified over 300 species as having the greatest conservation need.

“This landmark legislation is a labor of over a decade, and its success positions Oregon as a national leader in addressing species and habitat decline, many of which are also critical to our tourism industry,” said Sristi Kamal, Deputy Director at Western Environmental Law Center. “From the Oregon Coast to the Wallowas and all across the state, Oregonians have come together to support this bill and what makes Oregon special – our rich natural heritage. Over 300 of our most vulnerable wildlife, from northern red-legged frogs to northwestern pond turtles and spotted bats, have a lifeline now.” 

Species included as having the greatest conservation need are sea otters, Sierra Nevada red foxes, American pikas, silver-eared bats, North American porcupines, pygmy rabbits, western painted turtles, tufted puffins, great grey owl, desert horned lizard, Pacific lamprey, western bumblebee, and monarch butterfly. 

Also included in the proposal is support for fighting poaching, promoting habitat connectivity, combating invasive species, funding wildlife coexistence, wildfire risk reduction, and conservation workforce programs.

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

Salem, Ore., – Today, the Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue approved HB 4134, sending the bill to the full Senate for consideration. HB 4134 would fund wildlife and habitat projects across the state through a modest increase in the statewide lodging tax. The legislation has garnered support from a broad coalition of conservation, hunting, fishing, forestry, farming, ranching, and business stakeholders.

Testimony on the bill has been in favor of the proposal, with over 84% of the over 2000 pieces of submitted testimony indicating support.

“Oregonians have shown up in force for wildlife, rallying at the Capitol, calling and emailing, and submitting an overwhelming number of comments in support of this bill,” said Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager for Oregon Wild. “The Senate should respect that broad, bipartisan backing and send HB 4134 to the Governor’s desk without delay.”

Background

HB 4134 comes at a critical time for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), which has identified nearly 300 species in decline. Under the Trump administration, federal agencies are cutting back on wildlife science and conservation, and dismantling protections for imperiled species and their habitats. States like Oregon are being told to take on a greater share of the burden, but ODFW lacks the funding needed to proactively conserve non-game species and the habitats they depend on. Investing now can help prevent future conflicts and avoid the far greater ecological and financial costs that arise when species become endangered.

Also included in the proposal is support for fighting poaching, combating invasive species, and funding wildlife coexistence programs.

HB 4134 would modestly increase Oregon’s statewide lodging tax, currently one of the lowest in the country, so that visitors help fund the very natural beauty that draws them here in the first place. From elk in Eastern Oregon to seabirds along the coast, wildlife is one of the state’s biggest tourism assets.

An economic analysis found that the fee increase would not deter tourism and could actually boost outdoor recreation spending in Oregon by improving visitor experiences and protecting iconic wildlife and landscapes.

Photo by Jacob Durrent

Vote of 36 to 22 moves the bill to the Oregon Senate

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

Salem, Ore., – Today, the Oregon House of Representatives voted 36 to 22 to pass HB 4134, the “1.25% for Wildlife” bill. The legislation has garnered broad support from conservation, hunting, fishing, ranching, and farming groups, as well as businesses across the state. The bill passed with the required three-fifths majority and now advances to the Oregon Senate.

“HB 4134 unites Oregonians from trailheads to working lands around the values we all share: safeguarding Oregon’s wildlife and habitats now, so future generations inherit the state we love,” said Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager for Oregon Wild.

HB 4134 comes at a critical time for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), which has identified nearly 300 species in decline. Under the Trump administration, federal agencies are cutting back on wildlife science and conservation, and dismantling protections for imperiled species and their habitats. States like Oregon are being told to take on a greater share of the burden, but ODFW lacks the funding needed to proactively conserve non-game species and the habitats they depend on. Investing now can help prevent future conflicts and avoid the far greater ecological and financial costs that arise when species become endangered.

Also included in the proposal is support for fighting poaching, combating invasive species, and funding wildlife coexistence programs.

HB 4134 would modestly increase Oregon’s statewide lodging tax, currently one of the lowest in the country, so that visitors help fund the very natural beauty that draws them here in the first place. From elk in Eastern Oregon to seabirds along the coast, wildlife is one of the state’s biggest tourism assets.

An economic analysis found that the fee increase would not deter tourism and could actually boost outdoor recreation spending in Oregon by improving visitor experiences and protecting iconic wildlife and landscapes.

Conservationists say proposal to “maximize” logging across nearly 2 million acres of Western Oregon BLM lands would devastate fish, wildlife, and threaten communities

Contact for more information

John Persell, Oregon Wild

Portland, Ore., – Tomorrow, the Trump Administration will publish a notice of proposed revisions for management plans that encompass Western Oregon Bureau of Land Management (BLM) forests, seeking to eliminate old-growth and wildlife protections in order to facilitate “maximum” logging capacity across nearly 2 million acres of public lands. The proposal includes reducing logging buffers for endangered fish, potentially eliminating old-growth reserves, and expanded clearcutting and similar aggressive logging practices, which the agency has previously acknowledged increase fire risk.

BLM manages scattered parcels across western Oregon, which contain some of the last remaining low-elevation old-growth forests in the state. Notable areas threatened by the proposal include parts of the Sandy River and North Fork Clackamas, the Valley of the Giants, the Upper Molalla River, Mary’s Peak, Crabtree Valley, Alsea Falls, and many more. See a map.

BLM Lands and Logging Projects: Silver Lining and Nails Creek

The notice suggests the proposal will include:

  • Nearly 2 million acres of public lands with reduced protections targeted for logging, including old-growth forests and other lands previously set aside for conservation
  • Shrinking logging buffers around rivers and streams to 25-100 feet, scientifically insufficient to protect endangered fish like coho salmon and steelhead
  • Placing logging above all other public lands uses, like recreation, wildlife habitat, and drinking water, in violation of the O&C Lands Act of 1937 and subsequent environmental laws and court rulings

“The BLM is already logging old-growth. They’re already clearcutting,” said Oregon Wild Staff Attorney John Persell. “This proposal would double down on the most destructive aspects of public lands management across even more of the landscape, prioritizing greed and political favors over the long-term health of our forests and communities. It puts wildlife habitat, salmon recovery, drinking water, and nearby communities at greater risk.”

This proposal is the latest in a set of Trump administration executive orders, rollbacks to environmental protections, and reductions in public transparency and engagement that impact for public lands and forests across the country.

Threatened Forests and Rivers on Western Oregon BLM Lands

After finalizing its 2016 Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon, which withdrew BLM lands from the Northwest Forest Plan and significantly weakened conservation protections, the agency began to propose increasingly aggressive logging projects. Oregon Wild and other conservation groups in Oregon have challenged numerous BLM logging proposals in recent years that have targeted mature and old-growth forests.

Courts have sided with conservation groups, highlighting that, even under the significantly weaker safeguards of the 2016 RMPs, the agency has regularly violated its own rules and bedrock environmental laws in order to facilitate commercial logging projects. In recent litigation, the BLM has even been accused by those who worked for the agency of fabricating analysis that would allow more aggressive logging.

“The public does not want to go back to the days of rampant old-growth clearcutting. They don’t want to go back to dead salmon and polluted rivers, or see their favorite places on public lands liquidated in order to maximize profits for the greedy few,” said Chandra LeGue, Senior Conservation Advocate for Oregon Wild. “These are treasured public lands, and we’re going to fight for them.”

 ###

Hundreds Rally in Support of Wildlife and Habitats

Advocates gathered in support of HB 4134

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

Salem, Ore., – Hundreds of wildlife and habitat advocates from across the state gathered in Salem today in support of HB 4134, the “1.25% for Wildlife” legislation. HB 4134 has garnered broad, bipartisan support from a diverse coalition of hunters, anglers, farmers, ranchers, conservationists, rural and urban communities, and over 100 businesses from across the state.  

“This bill must pass this year,” said Oregon Wild Wildlife Program Manager Danielle Moser before the crowd gathered on the Capitol steps. “The longer we wait to address species and the habitats that sustain them, the more costly it becomes, and the more difficult it becomes.” 

Oregon House Representative Ken Helm also addressed the crowd, calling the bill a “unicorn” because it had bipartisan, bicameral support.

After the rally, participants dispersed to attend pre-scheduled meetings with their elected representatives to discuss the importance of investing in Oregon’s natural heritage and how wildlife conservation and other aspects of the bill relate to their own experiences and values. 

Healthy ecosystems support clean drinking water, reduce wildfire risk, sustain Oregon’s outdoor economy, and protect public health. Early investments in conservation can prevent species from declining to crisis levels, avoiding higher costs and greater conflict in the future. 

HB 4134  would dedicate a small portion of Oregon’s lodging tax to support wildlife conservation, habitat restoration, wildfire risk reduction, and conservation workforce development. Supporters say the proposal represents a forward-looking and fiscally responsible approach to protecting Oregon’s natural legacy while investing in Oregon’s outdoor recreation economy.

Bald Eagles, photo by Keith Wallach

The following letter was organized by the Western States Center.

In Minnesota, federal immigration agents have been terrorizing the community with impunity. ICE is increasingly operating as an unaccountable paramilitary force, kidnapping people off the street and distributing retribution against community members who stand up for their neighbors, use their freedom of speech to protest, and take a stand against this administration’s miscarriages of justice.  

Today, January 23, Minnesotans are coming together for a statewide day of nonviolent action to call for ICE Out of Minnesota, an independent investigation into the killing of Renee Good, and no additional federal funding for ICE. 

With this statement, Oregon communities express our solidarity with Minnesota. Over the last year, Oregon has also been deeply affected by abuses perpetrated by ICE. We know that what federal agents can get away with in Minnesota will quickly become precedent for the horrors they can inflict on all our communities.  

We stand with Minnesotans in mourning the lives ended and irrevocably changed by ICE violence and abuse of power. While the threats ICE poses to the lives and well-being of immigrant communities are not new, the current immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota represents a frightening new moment in which communities find themselves under siege, unable to participate in education, open businesses, or walk down the street without facing potential questioning, violence, and abduction.  

We also stand with Minnesotans in their resolve to protect our neighbors. There is no force large enough, and there are no reprisals brutal enough, to stop communities from standing up for each other. Wherever ICE shows up next, people are learning from Minnesotans’ courageous nonviolent resistance and planning ahead with an eye towards protecting our neighbors. Many Oregonians are already organizing their communities to mitigate and document the devastating impact ICE has on our communities.  

We will do our part to end ICE impunity. Today, we speak out in solidarity with Minnesota. Tomorrow, and every day, we will show up for the safety and freedoms of all. ICE Out of Minnesota. ICE Out of all of our communities.  

Signers

Elected Officials

Oregon State Senator Sara Gelser Blouin

Oregon State Senator Wlnsvey Campos

Oregon State Senator Khanh Pham

Oregon State Senator Mark Meek

Oregon State Senator Courtney Neron Misslin

Oregon State Senator Deb Patterson

Oregon State Senator Floyd Prozanski

Oregon State Senator James I Manning Jr

Oregon State Senator Lew Frederick

Oregon State Representative Willy Chotzen

Oregon State Representative Lamar Wise

Oregon State Representative Lisa Fragala

Oregon State Representative Dacia Grayber

Oregon State Representative Travis Nelson

Oregon State Representative Farrah Chaichi

Oregon State Representative Thuy Tran

Oregon State Representative Hai Pham

Oregon State Representative Tom Andersen

Mayor Melanie Kebler, City of Bend

Commissioner Laurie Trieger, Lane County

City Councilor Kori Rodley, City of Springfield

City Councilor Elise Yarnell Hollamon, City of Newberg

Commissioner Bubba King, Yamhill County

City Councilor Ashley Hartmeier-Prigg, City of Beaverton

City Councilor Taylor Giles, City of Sherwood

Council President Sal Peralta, City of McMinnville

City Councilor Scott Cunningham, City of McMinnville

Organizations

APANO Communities United Fund

APANO Action Fund

Basic Rights Oregon

Coalition of Communities of Color

Common Cause Oregon

Consolidated Oregon Indivisible Network

Democratic Party of Oregon

Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

Latino Network

Oregon Futures Lab

Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education

Oregon Justice Resource Center

Oregon Just Transition Alliance

Oregon League of Conservation Voters

Oregon Peace Institute

Oregon Rural Action

Oregon School-Based Health Alliance

Oregon Wild

Oregon Working Families Party

PCUN

Rural Organizing Project

SEIU Local 503

Showing Up for Racial Justice, Springfield Eugene

Urban League of Portland

Logging sales in mature and old-growth forests continue to be developed in western Oregon BLM forests, and Oregon Wild continues to push back. The 42 Divide Project, south of Roseburg, would log beautiful, diverse forests - harming wildlife habitat and releasing stored carbon.

Roseburg, Ore. (January 2026)

Contact for more information

Brenna Bell, Crag Law Center
Peter Jensen, Cascadia Wildlands
John Persell, Oregon Wild
Janice Reid, Umpqua Watersheds

Today, a coalition of conservation organizations filed suit challenging the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) “42 Divide Forest Management Plan” (42 Divide) near Camas Valley, Oregon. The agency proposes to aggressively log thousands of acres of diverse forest stands, even though more than half the land is in reserves set aside for habitat conservation. The area targeted for logging covers nearly 7,000 acres of public lands within the checkerboard of public and private lands in Douglas County, already heavily impacted by private industrial clearcuts. 

The forests and waterways within the project area are home to federally protected northern spotted owl, marbled murrelet, Oregon Coast coho salmon, and BLM designated sensitive species western pond turtles. The targeted area contains healthy, diverse stands of mature forest, including Douglas fir, cedar and madrone, and is home to a great diversity of plant, animal, and fungal life. Not only will the project negatively impact these species, the BLM itself recognizes that it will increase fire risk in the area by creating hundreds of tons of post-logging slash.

Heavy thinning and clearcutting will make these forests more vulnerable to wildfire. Logging removes large trees with thick bark and protective forest canopies. This tends to make the forest hotter, drier, and windier, drying out fuels and driving more extreme fire behavior. Logging also stimulates the growth of hazardous surface and ladder fuels. Despite community concerns, BLM wants to conduct logging that makes wildfire risk and hazard worse for surrounding communities for decades. 

“Our organizations are challenging 42 Divide out of great concern that it does not advance BLM’s purported purposes of restoration and resilience, instead threatening imperiled wildlife, increasing fire hazard, and decreasing these forests’ resilience to disturbance,” said Peter Jensen, staff attorney with Eugene-based Cascadia Wildlands. “The fish and wildlife within the area, as well as the communities in and around these public lands, are put at greater risk by BLM’s timber-centric agenda and disregard for ecosystem needs, public outcry, and federal environmental law.”

The lawsuit alleges the project violates federal law and the agency’s own regulations by failing to protect older forest stands in late successional reserves (LSRs). Late successional reserves are designed to protect remaining older, structurally complex forest–the highest value spotted owl nesting and roosting habitat, and to promote forests maturing into the types of habitat essential to spotted owls where the forest does not currently function as such. BLM’s analysis and ultimate conclusion that this project would not significantly affect the environment failed to address key issues, omitted necessary analysis of critical resource issues and wildlife management concerns, and ultimately left more questions than answers and more controversy than collaboration with the public. 

”BLM continues to wrap large logging projects targeting mature and old-growth forests in a veneer of ‘restoration’ and “resilience”, despite the research showing the logging would negatively impact protected wildlife and increase wildfire risk, and despite the clear legal mandate to protect these forests,” said Brenna Bell, senior staff attorney, Crag Law Center. “It should not require legal action to get this federal agency to follow its own management plan and manage public lands to benefit more than just the timber industry.”

BLM first proposed the 42 Divide in November 2021, subsequently issuing draft planning documents and pausing the project a few times, most recently for further study and endangered species analysis before ultimately issuing the December 2025 decision. The conservation organizations, along with local community members, engaged at every public comment opportunity, voicing their concerns. To the agency’s credit, BLM deferred over 400 acres of logging in occupied northern spotted owl habitat, but myriad other concerns raised by the plaintiffs and community members remained unresolved. 

“In such a diverse and important ecosystem, home to sensitive and imperiled wildlife species, BLM must do better,” said Janice Reid of Umpqua Watersheds. “The agency must conserve and protect imperiled wildlife species and their habitats, and demonstrate compliance with federal environmental laws before authorizing such large-scale industrial forestry practices on public lands.” 

“The BLM continues to shirk its obligations to the public and the law in its pursuit of large commercial logging projects,” said John Persell with Oregon Wild. “Aggressive logging in these protected areas not only endangers fish and wildlife, but it also adds to the cumulative destruction of the landscape already ravaged by the surrounding private-land clearcuts. Public lands are supposed to be a refuge from this kind of destruction, not an extension of it.”

The organizations are represented by attorneys from Crag Law Center and Cascadia Wildlands. 

 ###

Missoula, Mont. (January 2026)

Today, a coalition of wildlife advocates filed a complaint in the Federal District Court for the District of Montana against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for failing to designate critical habitat for wolverine, listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in November of 2023. The law requires the Service to designate critical habitat within a year of listing, but the agency has not done so nor issued a proposed rule, even though only about 300 wolverines remain in the Lower 48 states.

Scientific studies show that critical habitat designation is a primary driver in the recovery of imperiled species. As such, in the Endangered Species Act, Congress directed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to provide a “means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved,” with explicit deadline requirements to do so.

The wildlife advocates seek to promote wolverine recovery by ensuring the most important areas for supporting these populations are protected via a court-ordered, agreed-upon deadline for the agency to designate critical habitat.

Ruling closes loophole used to approve large-scale commercial logging without environmental review

Medford, Ore. (January 2026)

Contact for more information

Erin Hogan-Freemole, WildEarth Guardians
John Persell, Oregon Wild
Ralph Bloemers, Green Oregon Alliance
Oliver Stiefel, Crag Law Center

Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that the U.S. Forest Service unlawfully created and applied a categorical exclusion, known as “CE-6”, which the agency had recently begun misusing to approve large-scale commercial logging projects. The court set aside the exclusion for future actions and vacated approvals for three major logging projects in southern Oregon. 

The court found that the Forest Service failed to make the required findings under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that commercial logging would not cause significant environmental harm. As a result, the agency may no longer rely on CE-6 to bypass environmental analysis for planned or future projects.  

The ruling states “Because the record before the Court does not show the Forest Service considered the impact of thinning at any scale, commercial or otherwise, the Court cannot conclude the Forest Service engaged in a ‘reasoned decision’ regarding environmental impacts of the actions authorized by CE-6.” 

“This ruling delivers a tremendous victory for forests and communities across the country,” said Erin Hogan-Freemole, attorney for WildEarth Guardians.  “The Forest Service can no longer disregard environmental impacts simply because Trump ordered the agency to ramp up logging on the public’s forests. The court’s decision protects wildlife, water supplies, and our communities by closing this loophole that has allowed the Forest Service to authorize industrial-scale logging under the guise of restoration at great cost to our forests and all who depend on them.” 

“The Forest Service’s defense of CE-6 was a house of cards,” said Oliver Stiefel, attorney with Crag Law Center. “There is—and never has been—any legal basis for the agency to use a regulation intended for small, innocuous projects for massive commercial logging projects instead. We’re pleased to see the Court put an end to the agency’s overreach.”

“Categorical exclusions,” or “CEs,” like CE-6 sidestep the environmental analysis and public participation required by federal environmental laws. Historically, they were used on small, non-controversial projects. In recent years, however, CEs have been deployed on larger projects, invoking increasingly controversial rationales for disregarding science and locking the public out of public lands management decisions. Community advocates and conservation organizations have warned that CEs are taking resources and focus away from wildfire projects that actually protect homes and communities in order to log mature and old-growth trees in the backcountry, away from public scrutiny. 

“Invalidating CE-6 drags Trump’s Forest Service out of the shadows,” said John Persell, Staff Attorney for Oregon Wild. “They will no longer be able to use this bureaucratic loophole to hide the impacts of massive commercial logging projects or exclude the public from having a voice on how our public lands are managed.”  

Environmental groups brought this suit in 2022, but the Forest Service had successfully stalled its resolution on the legal merits until recently. Once the court was able to consider the record and the scientific evidence, it swiftly ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor following oral arguments heard in December 2025. 

In ruling for the plaintiffs, the court stated, “The Forest Service’s error here was as much a failure to put forth a reason as it was an error of reasoning.”

“The court’s decision does not block wildfire risk reduction,” Hogan-Freemole noted. “It simply requires the Forest Service to do what the law demands: analyze impacts honestly.  We’re still working to understand the scope of this ruling, but it’s undeniably a huge win for forests and the public interest.”

“The most destructive fires of our time weren’t stopped by thinning, fuel breaks, or previously treated forests. They were wind-driven ember storms that ignited homes and turned neighborhoods into fuel,” said Ralph Bloemers, Director of Fire Safe Communities.  “The court’s ruling forces agencies to prove what they claim, analyze what they authorize, and stop treating communities as collateral damage in a logging strategy that will not save them.”

The court’s order does not affect existing timber contracts and allows the Forest Service to proceed with projects using proper environmental review or other lawful authorities–as the court explained, “setting aside CE-6 does not leave the Forest Service without alternatives to address wildfire risk.”  Instead, it requires the agency to explain its decisions to the public before authorizing industrial-scale logging.

The lawsuit was brought by Oregon Wild, WildEarth Guardians, and Go Alliance, who challenged the Forest Service’s use of CE-6 to approve tens of thousands of acres of commercial thinning in the Fremont-Winema National Forest, and asked the court to block the rule’s application to commercial logging. The plaintiffs were represented by Hogan-Freemole, and Oliver Stiefel and Meriel Derzen of Crag Law Center.

Salem, Ore. (December 2025)

Contact for more information

Miles Johnson, Columbia Riverkeeper
Steve Pedery, Oregon Wild

The Oregon Court of Appeals has overturned a December 2022 rule by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) that weakened protections for migratory fish like salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, and lamprey. The Nez Perce Tribe and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, along with seven nonprofit organizations, had sued to overturn ODFW’s rule.

The court’s decision reinstates Oregon’s long-standing requirement that artificial barriers to fish migration, like dams, be upgraded to allow fish to swim freely past. The court struck down ODFW’s new rule allowing dam operators to trap salmon and load them into trucks for transport around dams—a process with much lower survival rates. 

ODFW’s new rule was overturned because ODFW failed to notify Tribes or the public before making this important rule change. According to the Court, “The lack of notice [deprived] people whose interests are historically, culturally, and integrally intertwined with the policies at issue of a role in the process . . . .”

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Board of Trustees Chair Kat Brigham said, “The CTUIR appreciates the Oregon Court of Appeals for upholding the importance of transparency and public participation in decisions that affect our rivers and fish. This ruling affirms that agencies must follow the law and respect the voices of all stakeholders, including sovereign tribal nations. It is the right decision for the health of our waterways and the cultural and natural resources that sustain our people and others in Oregon.”

Nez Perce Tribal Chairman Shannon Wheeler commented, “This is a highly significant, consequential, and protective decision for native migratory fish in Oregon, for Oregonians, and for Nez Perce people throughout the Tribe’s treaty-reserved territory in Oregon. For us, the decision confirms, for future fish passage requirements on rivers throughout Nez Perce territory in Oregon, and right now at the Wallowa Lake Dam reconstruction in the heart of the Nez Perce homeland, that Oregon’s fish passage regulation requires volitional passage unless an exemption can be proved publicly, and that state regulations cannot be revised by an agency at the last minute in a back room with no public notice and comment. The Court of Appeals’ decision is grounded in common sense and clear reasoning, and is a reminder of the indispensable oversight and protective role the courts play for all of us.” 

“Healthy fisheries are vital to Tribes, river communities, and Oregon’s culture and economy; they deserve the highest level of protection,” said Miles Johnson, Legal Director for Columbia Riverkeeper. “It’s gratifying to see that protection restored.”

“ODFW’s attempt to weaken Oregon’s rules protecting salmon without telling Tribes or the public was both misguided and illegal,” said Steve Pedery, Conservation Director with Oregon Wild. “Clearly, the Oregon Court of Appeals agreed.”

“By ODFW’s own count, there are 42,780 artificial barriers to fish migration along rivers, streams, and creeks in Oregon,” said Mark Sherwood, Executive Director for Native Fish Society. “The Department should be doing everything possible to aid these struggling fish populations, not creating more barriers by cutting corners in laws meant to protect these fish.”

The conservation and fishing groups involved in the legal challenge include Columbia Riverkeeper, The Conservation Angler, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Native Fish Society, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Oregon Wild, and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations. They are represented by the non-profit Crag Law Center.

Case Documents: 

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

Portland, Ore., – The Trump administration this week announced a sweeping series of rollbacks to wildlife and habitat protections under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These actions revive efforts previously attempted during Trump’s first term, which were later blocked by the Biden administration. The newly proposed rules would weaken core safeguards for threatened species, limit habitat protections, and elevate the priorities of logging, mining, and oil industries over wildlife recovery.

Oregon is home to several endangered species, including Humboldt marten, coho salmon, western painted turtle, monarch butterfly, Oregon silverspot butterfly, Gentner’s fritillary, rough popcorn flower, and Howell’s spectacular thelypody.

One of the most significant proposals would eliminate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s long-standing “blanket rule.” This rule automatically extends protections to species that are newly listed as threatened. Under the Trump proposal, threatened species would no longer receive automatic safeguards. Instead, agencies would be required to create individual rules for each species, creating a lengthy and cumbersome process that leaves wildlife vulnerable at critical stages of decline.

A second proposal would force officials to weigh economic impacts when deciding whether to protect critical habitat. This change would increase the influence of industry interests and reduce the role of science in agency decisions. 

These rollbacks are in addition to earlier proposals that weaken wildlife protections, including narrowing the definition of “harm” under the ESA and President Trump’s March executive order, which threatened to sidestep species protections to accelerate logging projects in national forests and on public lands.

“Oregon Wild opposed these reckless rollbacks during Trump’s first term, and we will do so again,” said John Persell, Senior Staff Attorney at Oregon Wild. “The Endangered Species Act has saved 99 percent of the species under its protection. Weakening its core provisions at the request of industry lobbyists puts decades of conservation progress at risk.”

With the federal government once again turning wildlife protections into a political battleground, Oregon Wild is championing strong state-level action to safeguard species that are already declining.

“Under the Trump administration, the logging, mining, and oil and gas industries are calling the shots in Washington, DC. As a result, states will increasingly have to fill the gap,” said Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager for Oregon Wild. “The extinction crisis is not something that’s just happening in other countries. Oregon has more than three hundred species of greatest conservation need, and that list continues to grow. This is why proposals like ‘1% for Wildlife’ are so important.”

The ‘1% for Wildlife‘ proposal, which is expected to be considered during the Oregon Legislature’s 2026 short session, would dedicate a modest increase in the statewide lodging tax to wildlife conservation, habitat restoration, and community resilience projects. Even with this increase, Oregon’s lodging tax would remain among the lowest in the country. Economic analysis has shown that the proposal would not harm tourism competitiveness. The funding would help preserve the landscapes and wildlife that draw visitors to Oregon.

“Oregon cannot afford to let wildlife conservation rise or fall based on the political landscape in Washington, DC,” added Moser. “By passing ‘1% for Wildlife,’ state leaders can ensure Oregon’s species and habitats have the stable funding they need regardless of federal politics.”

Oregon Wild will oppose the administration’s efforts to weaken the ESA and will continue its long-standing work to defend imperiled species and the habitats they depend on.

Photo by USFS

Join Our
Newsletter.

Staying informed is the first step to becoming a public lands and native wildlife advocate.

Skip to content