Salamander in Mount Hood National Forest Oregon by Bryce Wade
Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

Amy Patrick, Oregon Hunters Association

Colin Reynolds, Defenders of Wildlife

Tristan Henry, Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership

Bob Rees, Northwest Guides and Anglers Association

SALEM, OR – A landmark bill to fund wildlife conservation in Oregon is being held up in the State Senate, despite passing the House with strong bipartisan support and clearing Senate Rules. HB 2977, backed by a broad and diverse coalition across Oregon (listed at the bottom of this release), is now stalled due to obstruction by two Republican senators, Daniel Bonham and Cedric Hayden, who are using procedural tactics to try to kill the bill.

“This bill has support from every corner of the state,” said Amy Patrick of the Oregon Hunters Association. “It’s a smart, fair solution to address a wildlife funding crisis, and it’s been shaped by everyone from hunters and anglers to birders and business owners. The House did its job. The Senate Rules Committee did its job. I urge the two senators attempting now to derail it to respect the extensive work done by stakeholders and legislators alike, and allow the bill to move forward.”

The so-called “minority report” being wielded to delay the bill has already been written and is available to view, but Senators Bonham and Hayden refuse to officially submit it. 

According to the rules of the Oregon Legislature, Senate President Rob Wagner has the ability to put HB 2977 for a vote on the floor. 

“Senate President Rob Wagner has the power to put HB 2977 on the floor today—and Oregonians from across the state are calling on him to do so,” said Danielle Moser of Oregon Wild. “This is not a party-line issue. Our wildlife, the habitats they depend on, and the democratic process deserve better.”

Over 70% of the submitted testimony available on the Oregon Legislative Information System (OLIS) is in support of the bill.

“Oregon’s fish and wildlife is big business in Oregon, and this incredible resource is in jeopardy of blinking out,” said Bob Rees of the Northwest Guides and Anglers Association. “The Oregon Legislature is on the precipice of passing its first meaningful funding to turn the tide of these imperiled species through a bipartisan wildlife funding bill. If this bill doesn’t pass, those imperiled species will continue down the path to extinction and, along with it, our community of outdoor enthusiasts that represents one of the greatest transfers of wealth from urban to rural communities in Oregon. We’ll hold those obstructing the passage of this bill personally responsible for its demise, the first real opportunity to recover Oregon’s troubled fish and wildlife species.”

“Rarely has a bill brought a more diverse stakeholder coalition together like HB 2977 has, and with strong bipartisan support in both chambers of the legislature, the bill was set for success,” said Dr. Sristi Kamal, Deputy Director of the Western Environmental Law Center. “But now it is being held hostage by gimmicky tactics such as a minority report by a few Senate Republicans who want to kill HB 2977. They have no interest in unifying rural and urban Oregon and instead thrive by dividing us. We urge the Senate Democratic Party to save HB 2977, and honor the democratic process that got the bill this far.”

Stakeholders are particularly frustrated that genuine compromise and broad consensus are being undermined by obstruction.

“HB 2977 is the result of ranchers, guides, hoteliers, birders, business owners, and sportsmen all pulling in the same direction,” said Tristan Henry, Oregon Field Representative for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “The Senate has an opportunity now to finish what this broad coalition started and deliver a lasting wildlife-funding solution for Oregon. We urge President Rob Wagner and Senate leadership to use every tool available to move HB 2977 forward and pass it into law.”

HB 2977 would increase Oregon’s statewide transient lodging tax—currently one of the lowest in the nation—to provide long-overdue funding for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The agency has identified nearly 300 species in decline, yet lacks the resources to protect and recover them.

recent economic analysis found that the bill would not deter tourism and could actually boost outdoor recreation spending in Oregon by improving visitor experiences and protecting iconic species and landscapes.

Supporters say the bill is a win-win: funding from tourists to protect the wildlife and landscapes they come to see, and economic benefits for rural communities that rely on outdoor recreation.

“The passage of HB 2977 would be one of Oregon’s most significant environmental achievements in decades,” said Colin Reynolds, senior advisor to the Northwest program at Defenders of Wildlife. “This bill would deliver long-awaited and necessary sustainable funding for Oregon’s essential wildlife conservation programs that support our iconic species like the marbled murrelet, Southern Resident orca and fisher. On behalf of Defenders of Wildlife’s over 40,000 members and supporters in Oregon, I call on the Oregon legislature to pass this bipartisan bill before the end of the legislative session.”

SUPPORT FOR HB 2977

American Bird Conservancy

American Sportfishing Association

Backcountry Hunters and Anglers

Bird Alliance of Oregon

Blue Mountains Forest Partners

Cascadia Wildlands

Center for Biological Diversity

Central Oregon LandWatch

Chintimini Wildlife Center

Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation

Defenders of Wildlife

Elakha Alliance

Environment Oregon

Great Old Broads for Wilderness

HOWL for Wildlife

Humane Voters Oregon

Humane World for Animals

Kalmiopsis Audubon Society

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center

Lane County Audubon Society

Mid-Willamette Bird Alliance

Native Fish Society

Northwest Guides and Anglers

Association

Oceana

Oregon Association of Shooting Ranges

Oregon Coast Alliance

Oregon Hunters Association

Oregon League of Conservation Voters

Oregon Natural Desert Association

Oregon Trappers Association

Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild Sheep Foundation

Oregon Wildlife Coalition

Oregon Wildlife Foundation

Oregon Wildlife Rehabilitation Association

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation

Rogue Riverkeeper

Salem Audubon Society

SEIU Local 503

Surfrider Foundation

The Conservation Angler

The Habitat Institute

The Wildlife Society, Oregon Chapter

Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership

Think Wild

Trout Unlimited, Oregon Council

WaterWatch of Oregon

Western Environmental Law Center

Western Invasives Network

Western Watersheds Project

Wildlands Network

Willamette Riverkeeper

Xerces Society

350PDX

Metolius River Ponderosa Pines by Brizz Meddings

Dismantling the Roadless Rule Would Put Clean Water and Wildlife at Risk, Increase Fire Risk

Contact:    
Lauren Anderson, Climate Forests Program Manager
Erik Fernandez, Wilderness Program Manager

Portland, OR — In a sweeping rollback of one of America’s most broadly supported and legally durable conservation measures, the Trump administration today announced it is eliminating the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This move puts nearly 2 million acres of Oregon’s most intact national forest lands at risk, including areas around the Metolius River, the Sandy River, the Oregon Dunes, Mount Hebo, Hardesty Mountain, Tumalo Mountain, and the Upper Hood River Valley.

Oregon Wild strongly condemns this short-sighted decision, which ignores decades of public input, legal precedent, and the irreplaceable ecological value of Oregon’s remaining wild forests.

“Once again, the Trump administration is siding with industry lobbyists and political insiders instead of the people of Oregon and the American public,” said Oregon Wild Climate Forests Program Manager Lauren Anderson. “This decision is an invitation for the most destructive commercial logging, roadbuilding, and development in some of the most remote, ecologically valuable, and unspoiled forests left in the country. These lands belong to all Americans, not just the industrial looters and billionaire donors who have the President’s ear.”

The Roadless Rule was established in 2001 after an unprecedented public process that included more than 600 hearings and 1.6 million comments. The vast majority of comments supported protecting roadless areas from logging and roadbuilding. The rule safeguarded 58.5 million acres of undeveloped national forests, including almost 2 million acres in Oregon, from most commercial development.

The Trump administration’s repeal of the rule comes amid a broader effort to ramp up logging on public forests in Oregon and across the West, as well as threats to sell off millions of acres of public lands, including in Oregon, to pay for Trump’s tax-cut and domestic militarization agenda. 

This effort is presented as “fire prevention,” but studies consistently show that roadbuilding and logging in backcountry forests do little to reduce fire risk near communities. In many cases, these activities increase fire risk while degrading clean water, fish and wildlife habitat, and outdoor recreation opportunities.

A recent poll showed that 74% believe the federal government should focus forest management on thinning small trees near homes and emergency services, rather than large-scale commercial logging in more remote areas like those currently protected by the Roadless Rule. Both state and federal policy heavily subsidize logging lucrative large trees in the backcountry in the name of ‘fire preparedness’ over effective ways to safeguard lives and communities.

“Oregon’s roadless forests are not only home to ancient trees and endangered wildlife. They are vital sources of clean drinking water for hundreds of thousands of people and support the state’s outdoor recreation economy,” said Erik Fernandez, Wilderness Program Manager for Oregon Wild. “Removing protections for these forests is not fire management. It is environmental vandalism.”

From the remote forests of the Rogue River-Siskiyou to the high headwaters of the Blue Mountains, Oregon’s roadless areas are among the state’s last best places. These landscapes provide refuge for salmon, steelhead, elk, and eagles. They offer cold clean water for communities like Ashland and Salem. They also offer a haven for hikers, hunters, and anyone seeking solitude in nature.

“Oregonians have made it clear time and again that they value their wildlands, clean water, and wildlife. The Trump administration’s decision is not only an attack on our environment. It is an attack on our values,” said Anderson.

Oregon Wild and its partners will continue to fight this decision in the courts, in Congress, and in communities across Oregon to ensure that roadless forests remain wild for future generations.


Background:

  • The 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule protected 58.5 million acres of undeveloped national forests from new roadbuilding and most forms of commercial logging
  • Nearly 2 million acres of Oregon’s national forests are protected by the Roadless Rule, including parts of Mount Hood, Hells Canyon, and the Siskiyou Mountains
  • These areas safeguard drinking water for more than 800,000 Oregonians and provide critical habitat for species like salmon, marbled murrelets, and bald eagles
  • Roadless lands support a robust outdoor recreation economy and are central to Oregon’s wild backcountry experiences
Sea otter by Lisa Hupp of the USFWS

Broad coalition celebrates win for conservation, rural economies, and Oregon’s outdoor legacy

Contact:    
Arran Robertson, Oregon Wild

Danielle Moser, Oregon Wild

SALEM, OR – In a major victory for Oregon’s fish, wildlife, and outdoor heritage, the Oregon House of Representatives has passed HB 2977, a bipartisan bill that would raise the state’s transient lodging tax (TLT) to provide long-overdue funding for wildlife conservation. The bill passed with the required three-fifths majority and now advances to the Oregon Senate.

The bill comes at a critical time for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), which has identified nearly 300 species in decline, including some on the brink of extinction. Yet the agency lacks the funding necessary to proactively conserve these species and their habitats.

“This is a smart, fair, and urgently needed investment in the future of Oregon’s wildlife and the habitats that make this state such a great place to live and visit,” said Danielle Moser at Oregon Wild. “Hunters, anglers, birders, ranchers, and conservationists have all come together to say: it’s time to act.”

HB 2977 would modestly increase Oregon’s statewide TLT, currently one of the lowest in the country, so that visitors help fund the very natural beauty and biodiversity that draw them here in the first place. From elk in Eastern Oregon to seabirds along the coast, wildlife is one of the state’s biggest tourism assets.

recent economic analysis found that the tax increase would not deter tourism and could actually boost outdoor recreation spending in Oregon by improving visitor experiences and protecting iconic species and landscapes.

“This is a win-win,” said Moser. “This proposal supports healthy ecosystems and rural economies, and it ensures that future generations will be able to enjoy the incredible wildlife that makes Oregon special.”

The legislation follows in the footsteps of Hawaii, which recently increased its hotel tax to help fund conservation and climate resilience. With similar broad support and momentum, Oregon is poised to lead the way in showing how tourism and wildlife can thrive together.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where its coalition of supporters hopes it will soon become law.

A mule deer foraging in the Ponderosa Pine forests of Eastern Oregon near La Pine by Brett Cole

Public Lands in Oregon at Risk as Senate Reconciliation Bill Revives Land Sale Scheme

Contact:    
Arran Robertson

PORTLAND, OR — A budget reconciliation proposal introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), Chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, would force the sale of up to 3.2 million acres of public lands across the West, including in Oregon. The bill, released last night, includes a provision requiring both the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to sell off public lands to offset tax cuts and other budgetary expenses (see pg. 30 of the bill).

The minimum land affected would exceed the size of Rhode Island and Delaware together. Oregon is explicitly listed as an eligible state where lands would be sold off. 

Recent polling shows 76% of Oregonians oppose selling public lands to pay for an extension of Trump’s tax cuts.

“Public lands belong to everyone. They shouldn’t be pawned off to offset tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy,” said Quinn Read, Executive Director at Oregon Wild. “This bill opens the door to selling off some of Oregon’s most treasured landscapes, potentially turning national forest edges into luxury estates with no real requirements for affordability or community benefit.”

While the bill is framed as a housing initiative, its primary function is to generate revenue. The legislation includes no safeguards to ensure the lands are used for workforce or affordable housing. Vague legislative language leaves room for high-end development on ecologically important and wildfire-prone lands.

An analysis from Headwaters Economics showed that the policy of selling off public lands for housing is complicated by wildfire and drought risks, as well as other development challenges. 

“This proposal is deeply unpopular, risky, and short-sighted,” continued Read. “Especially in places like Bend, expanding development deeper into fire-prone public lands doesn’t just damage habitat and recreation, it puts communities at greater risk.”

Just weeks ago, a proposal to sell off public lands in Utah and Nevada was stripped from the House version of the budget reconciliation bill after bipartisan backlash. Oregon Reps. Val Hoyle and Andrea Salinas voted against that amendment; Rep. Cliff Bentz voted in favor.

Northern Spotted Owl, Strix occidentalis caurina, Gifford Pinchot forest, Washington, (c) Tom Kogut/ USDA forest service
Contact:    
John Persell, Oregon Wild
Chelsea Stewart-Fusek, Center for Biological Diversity
Susan Jane Brown, Silvix Resources
Tom Wheeler, Environmental Protection Information Center
Sydney Wilkins, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
David Woodsmall, Western Environmental Law Center
Nick Cady, Cascadia Wildlands
Joe Liebezeit, Bird Alliance of Oregon
Dave Werntz, Conservation Northwest
Kimberly Baker, Klamath Forest Alliance

Portland, OR — Conservation groups intervened today in a lawsuit brought by the timber industry and counties seeking to strip northern spotted owls of protections for their critical habitat across millions of acres of forests in California, Oregon and Washington. 

The industry lawsuit attempts to reinstate a critical habitat rollback issued in the final weeks of the first Trump administration that removed nearly 3.5 million acres from the 9.6 million acres that were protected for spotted owls in 2012. 

“The logging industry wants to frame this lawsuit as just about the northern spotted owl, but what’s really at stake are our oldest, most resilient forests, forests that also provide cold, clean rivers for salmon, drinking water for communities and cherished places for countless people,” said John Persell, staff attorney for Oregon Wild. “Trump administration officials have made it clear they view these lands as little more than a source of profit. It’s up to all of us to stand up — for owls, salmon, clean water and carbon-storing forests — and say no.”

The northern spotted owl first gained critical habitat protection in 1992, and those were adjusted in 2012 under the Obama administration. That rule was challenged in court by the timber industry, resulting in a settlement and a January 2021 designation excluding 3.5 million acres from critical habitat protection, nearly all on public lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. 

Just 10 months later, the Biden administration rescinded the final designation and instead finalized a proposed rule that excluded 204,294 acres instead of 3.5 million acres. That Biden administration rule is being challenged by the timber industry’s current lawsuit, which is seeking to reinstate the expanded Trump administration revision.  

“The forests these precious owls depend on also provide all of us with benefits like clean water, recreation, jobs and climate resiliency,” said Chelsea Stewart-Fusek, an endangered species attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Given Trump’s relentless assaults on our most cherished wildlife and public lands, it’s no surprise that corporate timber interests are resurrecting their attacks on northern spotted owls and the places they live in the name of short-term profit.” 

“This latest attempt by the timber industry to remove protections for northern spotted owls is a cynical move that perpetuates not only the biodiversity and extinction crises, but also the pendulum swing regarding management of the owl’s habitat,” said Susan Jane Brown, attorney with Silvix Resources that represents some of the intervenors. “Rather than accept that the best available science requires the protection of millions of acres of spotted owl habitat to prevent the extinction and foster the recovery of the owl, industry’s lawsuit seeks to unnecessarily stoke controversy.”

“This is a tired story: the timber industry attempting to game the legal system in order to expand logging on our public lands,” said Tom Wheeler, executive director of the Environmental Protection Information Center. “Unfortunately for them, they have to come through us first. We have stood up for the northern spotted owls and science for decades and we aren’t backing down.”

“The lawyers for Big Timber are cherry-picking a courthouse across the country to attack old-growth spotted owl habitat in our neck of the woods,” said George Sexton, conservation director for Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center. “So we’re intervening to stand up for science and our forests.”

“With northern spotted owl population numbers in precipitous decline, the timber industry seeks to remove protections from a full third — 3.5 million acres — of the species’ critical habitat,” said David Woodsmall, attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center. “This is a choice by the industry to drive the northern spotted owl to extinction for private profit, antithetical to the American values of conservation embodied in our laws. Western Environmental Law Center has fought for northern spotted owl recovery for decades, and we will use the power of the law to thwart any action that threatens the survival of this iconic species.”

“Drastically reducing spotted owl habitat protections is not only antithetical to the best science we have for allowing the imperiled species to recover, but puts at risk all the other benefits that protecting these public lands provide to Oregonians, the very people that these lands are supposed to be managed for,” says Nick Cady with Cascadia Wildlands. “Aggressive logging increases wildfire risk, threatens drinking water sources, recreation opportunities, and much more all for the benefit of corporate timber barons.”

“With less than 3,000 spotted owls left and a population that is declining precipitously, this challenge is a slap in the face to conservation and the survival of this species. Any reduction in acreage of critical habitat could be this species’ death knell,” said Joe Liebezeit, statewide conservation director for Bird Alliance of Oregon.

“Everything needs a home to survive,” said Dave Werntz, science and conservation director at Conservation Northwest. “The northern spotted owl is no exception.”

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protected the northern spotted owl, a bird found only in the forests of the Pacific Northwest, as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in 1990. In 2020, because of continued loss of the old forests they need to live and competition with the invasive barred owl, the Service found northern spotted owls should now be classified as endangered but has yet to provide stronger protections for the species.

###

Bluegrass Ridge by Jurgen Hess

A strong majority of Oregonians disapprove of efforts to weaken environmental protections and privatize public lands, according to a new poll released today. From old-growth forests to endangered species, voters across the state want to see natural resources protected—not handed over to corporate interests.

Key findings include:

  • 76% of Oregoniansincluding 61% of rural residents—oppose selling off public lands to finance tax cuts. This comes as House Republicans recently advanced a proposal to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands in Utah and Nevada. Oregon Representatives Maxine Dexter and Val Hoyle voted against the amendment in the House Natural Resources Committee, with Cliff Bentz voting for it.

  • 74% believe the federal government should focus forest management on thinning small trees near homes and emergency services, rather than large-scale commercial logging. Both state and federal policy heavily subsidize logging lucrative large trees in the backcountry in the name of ‘fire preparedness’ over more effective ways to safeguard lives and communities.

  • 72% support more protections for mature and old-growth forests. Over 1 million public comments were submitted nationally in favor of stronger safeguards during the Biden administration, but efforts have been stalled by U.S. Forest Service leadership.

  • 67% opposed changing Endangered Species Act protections to remove habitat destruction from the definition of “harm” to wildlife. Right now, the law recognizes that “harm” includes not just directly killing or capturing wildlife—but also habitat destruction that makes it impossible for a species to feed, breed, or shelter.

  • 67% oppose logging projects up to 10,000 acres in size without environmental review or public input—a controversial provision in the Fix Our Forests Act, which passed the U.S. House earlier this year and faces a Senate hearing soon.

    Senator Ron Wyden has notably commented that the Fix Our Forests Act  “…undermines bedrock environmental laws, and would allow poorly designed, large commercial projects that threaten community drinking water, wildlife and recreation opportunities to proceed with inadequate environmental review.”

  • 65% oppose layoffs of public lands agency employees. The Trump administration has threatened additional “reduction in force” orders that put our public lands and communities at risk.

These views stand in stark contrast to the environmental policies promoted under President Trump and some Oregon lawmakers, including executive orders that placed logging above conservation.

“This poll affirms, once again, that Oregonians overwhelmingly favor policies that protect clean water, wildlife, and public lands for current and future generations—and reject partisan efforts to gut environmental safeguards,” said Oregon Wild spokesperson Arran Robertson.

Hobbart Bluff, Soda Mountain Wilderness by Alan Hirschmugl

This week, at nearly midnight, while most of us were asleep, Congressional House Republicans on the Natural Resources committee quietly pushed through a last-minute amendment to sell off thousands of acres of your public lands in Nevada and Utah. No public input. No debate. No explanation. And no analysis, so it wasn’t even clear how much land they were talking about. 

The amendment, slipped in by Reps. Mark Amodei (NV) and Celeste Maloy (UT), requires the Interior Department to sell off national public land in Nevada and Utah. While original reporting suggested the bill would only target 11,000 acres, further analysis suggests the amendment could target 500,000 acres in total — or more. Local conservation and Indigenous leaders are rightly pushing back on the amendment.

Corruption

But wait, it gets worse.

Rep. Bruce Westerman, the guy chairing this whole charade, recently bought stock in oil, gas, and mining companies—the exact corporations that would profit if this bill passes. 

From Public Domain:

Westerman was even more unique for buying shares of companies that in many cases develop resources on public lands, an area over which his committee has jurisdiction. He bought stakes in British Petroleum, ConocoPhillips, Shell, Chevron, Suncor and Canadian Natural Resources Limited in the field of oil and gas. He purchased stock in Emerson Electric Company, Siemens and Cummins — corporations that support the oil and gas supply chain. And he acquired shares in mining giants Freeport-McMoRan, BHP and Rio Tinto. 

When he got called out? He claimed an advisor did it “without his knowledge” and that he’s “in the process” of selling. How convenient.

A Polluter Wishlist

Meanwhile, this same bill slashes environmental protections, lowers fees for oil and gas drilling, and lets companies buy their way to fast-tracked permits with zero public accountability. It’s a polluter wishlist wrapped in a budget bill—and they passed it with no shame.

While the Republican members sat in silence, refusing to engage in any debate, Oregon was fortunate to have Rep. Maxine Dexter present and forcefully speaking out against this anti-environment, anti-public lands, and anti-public health agenda being passed by the committee.

A Trial Balloon

Oregon’s representatives on the committee, Dexter as well as Val Hoyle, both voted against selling off public lands. But Rep. Cliff Bentz voted for it—even though the lands are in another state, and that state’s own representative opposed the sale. In congressional circles, that’s not just controversial—it’s considered bad form.

Let’s be clear: while this amendment currently targets lands in Nevada and Utah, it opens the door to the wholesale privatization of public lands anywhere in the country. This is a test balloon. If we let it fly, they’ll be coming for more.

What You Can Do (Because They’re Hoping You Don’t)

TAKE ACTION: Reach out to your legislators and tell them public lands are NOT for sale

If you want to go beyond the action form above, here are the next steps. The Senate is our best shot at stopping this disaster. Call your Senators and tell them NO to public land sales and NO to industry-written giveaways in the budget reconciliation bill.

Senator Ron Wyden

  • wyden.senate.gov
  • (503) 326-7525
  • BlueSky: @wyden.senate.gov | Instagram: @ronwyden

Senator Jeff Merkley

  • merkley.senate.gov
  • (503) 326-3386
  • BlueSky: @jeff-merkley.bsky.social | Instagram: @senjeffmerkley

Call your Representative, too. Especially if their name is Bentz, Westerman, Amodei, or Maloy. Let them know you’re paying attention—and that public lands are not theirs to auction off.

Spread the word. Post it. Share it. Shout it from the mountaintops they’re trying to drill into.

Public lands belong to the people

At Oregon Wild, we’ve been fighting to protect public lands for over 50 years. And we’ve seen some outrageous stuff. But this? A secretive midnight vote to sell off our public lands while the committee chair holds stock in the companies that would profit?

This is a new low.

We know our community won’t stand for it. You’ve shown up time and time again to defend wild places. Now’s the time to do it again.

Because public lands belong to the people—not politicians, not billionaires, and definitely not a bunch of fossil fuel shareholders cashing in behind closed doors.

Feds failed to consider harm to ecosystems and failed to follow required environmental review processes

Contact:    
Peter Jensen, Cascadia Wildlands, peter@cascwild.org
John Persell, Oregon Wild, jp@oregonwild.org
Oliver Stiefel, Crag Law Center, oliver@crag.org

Eugene, OR — Conservation groups secured a victory as a federal court rejected the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) controversial Siuslaw HLB (“Harvest Land Base”) Project. The court held the agency’s proposed multi-decadal and aggressive logging plan near several communities west of Eugene, violated critical environmental review requirements.

Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild, with attorneys at Crag Law Center, brought suit arguing that the agency ignored the project’s potential impacts on soils, drinking water, invasive weeds, and threatened wildlife. The organizations also raised concerns about the cumulative effects of the Siuslaw HLB Project and the overlapping N126 Project, another Bureau of Land Management logging proposal a different judge ruled unlawful in late March. Federal law requires the agency to weigh the negative effects of logging against any claimed benefits from timber production — a step the Bureau of Land Management neglected.

“The Bureau of Land Management routinely disregards the serious risks that many of their logging projects impose,” said Nick Cady with Cascadia Wildlands. “We lose valuable, rare ecosystems and with it, wildfire resilience and drinking water quality, every time these mature forests are irresponsibly logged.” 

The Court ruled in favor of the conservation groups, finding that the Bureau of Land Management did not take the legally required “hard look” at the environmental impacts. Further, in his Opinion, Judge Kasubhai concluded that “This is not a case where the Court was unable to determine whether there may be significant effects. Rather, the Court has explicitly found […] that substantial questions exist over whether the Siuslaw Plan may have significant impacts. Under the clear rule set forth in the case law cited above, an EIS [environmental impact statement] must be prepared in light of that finding.” Accordingly, BLM’s choice not to take a hard look at the environmental consequences of its decision and prepare an environmental impact statement violated federal law.

“The Judge offered a strong rebuke of the agency’s shell game analysis, wherein the BLM refused to analyze impacts to key issues like sensitive soils, imperiled species, and invasive species, claiming that such impacts were either already addressed or would be in the future. But in truth, the agency’s approach meant that these critical issues would never be addressed in the manner that the law requires,” said Oliver Stiefel, Senior Staff Attorney, Crag Law Center.

The Siuslaw HLB Project sought to log 13,225 acres of public forests in the Coast Range foothills. The Bureau of Land Management’s own planning documents acknowledged that the project would increase the spread of invasive weeds, decrease slope stability and destroy soil health, and risked serious harm to numerous protected species (special status, bureau sensitive, or endangered), decrease fire resilience, and contaminate and degrade drinking water contamination. Notwithstanding, the agency dismissed these risks as insignificant.

“Whether it’s due to poor analysis or attempts to log old-growth trees for profit, the courts continue to reject the BLM’s unlawful logging projects,” said John Persell of Oregon Wild. “Clearcutting public lands, destroying wildlife habitat, endangering local communities — this is exactly the type of logging President Trump and his allies are now pushing on a larger scale. It’s not legal, it’s not what the public wants, and we’re going to keep fighting it.” 

Local residents have also voiced strong opposition, citing risks such as drinking water contamination, increased wildfire hazards, soil erosion, invasive species introduction, and the destruction of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities. The agency was unfazed by these concerns. It is encouraging to see federal courts in Oregon recognizing the problems associated with poor environmental analysis and serious risks those shortfalls pose to our forests.

The organizations are represented by attorneys from the Crag Law Center and Cascadia Wildlands.

###


Eugene-based Cascadia Wildlands defends and restores Cascadia’s wild ecosystems in the forests, in the courts, and in the streets. The organization envisions vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the Cascadia bioregion.

Oregon Wild’s mission is to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy. Oregon Wild is celebrating its 50th Anniversary this year.

Crag Law Center is a nonprofit environmental law center based in Portland, Oregon that  supports community efforts to protect and sustain the Pacific Northwest’s natural legacy. Implementing a unique model of legal aid for the environment, Crag balances the scales of justice by offering free and low-cost legal services to people who are working on the ground to protect our environment, climate and communities.

The breeding female of the new Yamsay Mountain Pack howls in front of a trail camera in the Winema National Forest.

Lower poaching and fewer state-sanctioned killings offer a glimpse of what’s possible for gray wolf recovery

Contact:    
Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager

After years of stagnating numbers, Oregon’s wolf population appears to have finally grown in 2024, according to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Annual Wolf Report. Oregon Wild is cautiously optimistic that a reduction in both poaching and state-killed wolves has given the state’s fragile wolf population a chance to rebound.

“For the first time in several years, it looks like Oregon’s wolves have had a little breathing room,” said Danielle Moser, Wildlife Program Manager for Oregon Wild. “Though human-caused mortality continues to be the primary obstacle to statewide recovery, any substantial growth is a welcome sign.”

2024 updates by the numbers

Population204
Breeding Pairs17
Total Mortality26
Known Poaching7
ODFW-killed11
Killed by vehicle collision1
“Caught-in-the-act”3

Despite claims from some lobbyists and politicians, there is no credible evidence to support the existence of a large, uncounted population of wolves in Oregon. Such assertions should be met with a demand for verifiable evidence before being treated as fact or quoted uncritically.

The double-digit increase in the wolf population is a marked departure from recent years. Since 2021, annual growth rates have remained under 2%, far below earlier years when protections were stronger and poaching rates were lower. Wildlife advocates point to lower documented cases of poaching and fewer wolves killed by ODFW as key reasons for this encouraging shift.

“This is not a coincidence,” said Moser. “When wolves aren’t being shot by the state or illegally poached with little consequence, they can do what wild animals do best—adapt and survive.”

Despite the improvement, Oregon Wild cautions that wolf recovery remains fragile. Wolves in eastern Oregon—where most of the population lives—still lack federal or state endangered species protections. The state’s current management policies continue to prioritize livestock industry interests, often at the expense of long-term recovery goals.

“We hope this year’s report is a turning point—not an outlier,” Moser added. “The path forward must center on compassion, coexistence, and restoring balance to Oregon’s wild places.”

###


Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Heavy construction vehicles log the forest

Fix Our Forests Act would open the door to widespread logging and undermine environmental laws

Contact:    
Steve Pedery, Oregon Wild

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Senators John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) introduced the Fix Our Forests Act (FOFA). In a giveaway to the timber industry, the bill – which is presented as a measure against wildfire – could open the door to unlimited logging across millions of acres of national forests, undermining bedrock environmental and public health laws. House Natural Resources Committee Chair Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) and Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) introduced companion legislation that passed the House in January 2025. 

The Senate version of FOFA arrived less than a week after President Trump’s Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, issued a memo that begins implementation of President Trump’s March 1 executive order to ramp up logging across over half of national forests. FOFA and Trump’s logging directives would both erode environmental laws and make it harder for members of the public to weigh in on government decisions, all of which could devastate forest health.

If passed, FOFA would allow logging on federal lands without scientific review and community input. The bill truncates ESA consultation requirements to protect threatened and endangered species and limits the right of citizens to judicial review, effectively barring communities from bringing lawsuits to hold federal agencies accountable.  

Both FOFA and the Trump administration’s recent actions call for changes in forest management that could ultimately worsen the risk of fire. The executive order seeks to increase timber targets, which would focus limited Forest Service staff on meeting commercial timber amounts rather than taking appropriate measures to reduce wildfire risk. These directives would also facilitate the removal of large old-growth trees that are naturally more fire-resilient. More logging will exacerbate the underlying causes of severe wildfire blazes – namely, dry forest conditions, caused by rising temperatures and a lack of precipitation due to climate change. 

The following is a statement from Earthjustice, Oregon Wild, Standing Trees, and the Center for Biological Diversity, groups in the Climate Forests Coalition.

“Whether we are talking about the Fix Our Forests Act or President Trump’s executive order on forests, we are talking about an attack on our national public lands. This Senate bill could open the door to unlimited logging of forests owned and cherished by all Americans. Cutting down our old-growth and mature trees will ultimately worsen climate change. Rather than handing the keys to the Trump administration to unleash a logging bonanza, Senators should propose an alternative bill focused on supporting sensible wildfire mitigation strategies such as home hardening, local emergency planning, and defensible space.”


Oregon Wild’s mission is to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy. Oregon Wild is celebrating its 50th Anniversary this year.

Flat Country Timber Sale by David Herasimtschuk
Contact:    
Steve Pedery, Oregon Wild

In response to a secretarial memo focused on expanded logging, Oregon Wild Conservation Director Steve Pedery issued the following statement, calling out the administration’s attempt to exploit public fear and override environmental safeguards for the benefit of the logging industry:

“This memo isn’t about protecting forests. It is about logging and looting 60% of America’s National Forest Lands, 112,646,000 acres, by declaring a fake emergency to justify weakening protections for our clean water, wildlife, and wildlands. When the Secretary of Agriculture says the primary goal is to ‘protect timber resources,’ it pulls the mask off this manufactured emergency.

This order would gut the ability of the American public to ensure that their clean drinking water and local forests are protected from poor logging practices These safeguards ensure that science, transparency, and community voices are part of the decision-making process. Gutting them only serves corporate logging interests.

The map shared by the Secretary is both vague and misleading. It includes areas that are off-limits to commercial logging and temperate rainforest areas where claims of high fire risk or other justifications are dubious at best. The chaotic and haphazard nature of the Secretarial Order’s release raises serious concerns about how these maps were produced, and who is really making decisions about Trump forest policy.

If this administration were serious about wildfire, it would invest in protecting homes and communities through programs to help homeowners with home hardening, defensible space, and emergency planning— not industrial logging in remote forests that destroys wildlife habitat and makes fire risks worse. The science is clear, and so is the motive behind this memo. Anyone who cares about clean water, wildlife, and public lands should join us in opposing this reckless scheme to loot our National Forests.”

Analysis

Impacts to Oregon in the President’s Executive Order and subsequent secretarial memo.

  • Over 11.2 million acres in Oregon are impacted
  • 64% of national forests in Oregon are impacted 
  • Over 1 million acres of wilderness in Oregon are impacted 
  • 47% – fraction of wilderness areas in Oregon impacted
  • Over 1.5 million acres of roadless areas in Oregon are impacted 
  • 76% – fraction of Oregon roadless areas impacted
  • Over 1.6 million acres in Oregon of critical habitat impacted 
  • Over 30% – fraction of Oregon critical habitat impacted

See NRDC’s full analysis 


Oregon Wild’s mission is to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy. Oregon Wild is celebrating its 50th Anniversary this year.

Forest marked for logging in Penn Butte timber sale, part of IVM (all trees not marked with yellow will be cut)
Contact:    
George Sexton, KS Wild, gs@kswild.org
Nick Cady, Cascadia Wildlands, nick@cascwild.org
John Persell, Oregon Wild, jp@oregonwild.org
Meriel Darzen, Crag Law Center, meriel@crag.org

MEDFORD, ORMedford, Ore., – Yesterday, Federal District Court Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) “Integrated Vegetation Management” (IVM) logging program illegally authorized the destruction of old-growth forest stands located within Late Successional Reserves. With this ruling, the court agreed that “gap creation” and “open seral” logging prescriptions within the Late Successional Reserves would have increased fire hazard while removing old-growth forest habitat.

Conservation groups from across Oregon challenged the IVM logging project with the goal of getting BLM forest managers to focus on fuels reduction and fire resiliency instead of logging old-growth forests to meet artificial timber targets.

“This ruling confirms that Late Successional Reserves are exactly what their name says,” said George Sexton, KS Wild Conservation Director. “These fire-resilient old-growth forest stands capture carbon while providing some of the best wildlife habitat left in southern Oregon.”

The first commercial IVM timber sales called Penn Butte and Late Mungers were located in the Williams Late Successional Reserve and would have removed over 400-acres of old-growth habitat through “open seral” logging and another 51 acres through “gap creation” clearcutting.

“Reckless timber sales like this are exactly why we need strong public oversight,” said John Persell, Staff Attorney for Oregon Wild. “Trump’s executive order to ramp up logging pushes for more destructive projects to benefit the timber industry, but the forests at Penn Butte and Late Mungers should be protected as key habitat and for carbon storage, not sacrificed for corporate profit.”

A primary problem with BLM’s IVM timber scheme was that timber planners hoped to avoid site-specific analysis and public input while removing old-growth forest habitat from Late Successional Reserves and increasing fire hazard in logged forest stands.

“If the BLM is interested in real fire-focused restoration, we would be fully supportive,” said stated Cascadia Wildlands Legal Director Nick Cady, “but that is not what the IVM logging program is. Aggressively logging wildlife habitat in the Late Successional Reserves that will increase fire hazard for the surrounding community is ridiculous. It demonstrates that this agency does not care what this community has been through and is only concerned with producing timber volume.” 

The successful legal challenge was argued by Meriel Darzen of the Crag Law Center on behalf of KS Wild, Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands, and the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council. In the shadow of the Trump Administration’s anti-environmental Executive Orders, Crag remains committed to the rule of law.

###


Eugene-based Cascadia Wildlands defends and restores Cascadia’s wild ecosystems in the forests, in the courts, and in the streets. The organization envisions vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the Cascadia bioregion.

Oregon Wild’s mission is to protect and restore Oregon’s wildlands, wildlife, and water as an enduring legacy. Oregon Wild is celebrating its 50th Anniversary this year.

KS Wild‘s mission is to protect and restore wild nature in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of southwest Oregon and northwest California.

Through a unique model of “legal aid for the environment,” Crag Law Center provides free and low-cost legal services to people and organizations who are working on the ground to protect our environment, climate and communities.

Join Our
Newsletter.

Staying informed is the first step to becoming a public lands and native wildlife advocate.

Skip to content